英语翻译AbstractHydrogen generation,battery electric storage,and

英语翻译
Abstract
Hydrogen generation,battery electric storage,and compressed air energy storage are
compared on an efficiency basis for effectively applying renewable electric energy to
transportation goals.Results are presented as a driving range,in kilometers,achievable
with a uniform input of 100 MJ of wind-generated,AC electricity to each type of energy
storage technology.Lithium-ion battery electric vehicles can achieve up to 133 km of
range with this input.In contrast,compressed air cars and fuel cell vehicles achieve 46
and 42 kilometers,respectively,with the same 100 MJ of input electricity.The vehicle
ranges are compared for Taurus-class vehicles driving in a standard urban drive cycle.
Introduction
Renewable energy technologies are quickly penetrating the energy generation market,
principally in response to an urgent need to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) released
into the atmosphere.Central energy generators like megawatt-scale wind turbines,run-ofthe-
river hydroelectric plants,tidal and wave stations are well-suited to integrate into the
electric grid.But how can these new resources be best used to displace the GHGs
produced by the worldwide fleet of gasoline and diesel-fueled vehicles?
Even solar photovoltaic energy,well-suited for distributed applications,cannot power an
independent,consumer-friendly vehicle directly.The energy density required for the
automotive performance expected by consumers is simply too high to be available through
commercially achievable photovoltaic products.Vehicles restricted to tracks can utilize
energy transmitted from larger solar power installations or other renewable technologies,
but independent vehicles always require energy storage.
As pressure grows to curtail the GHG emissions of vehicles,most of the resources
considered for the purpose will be the same electric generating technologies currently
being added to the power grid.So the questions and answers that will guide new vehicle
development boil down almost entirely to comparative analyses of energy storage
technologies.
In this paper,we demonstrate such a comparative analysis by placing various energy
storage technologies in the context of a single system boundary that begins at the
terminals of any electric generator,and ends at a uniform work product:moving a Ford
Taurus-class car through an urban drive cycle.

摘要
氢世代,电池电的储藏,和被压缩的空气能源储藏是
为了有效地应用可重新开始的电能源以效率方式比较到
运输目标.在公里中,结果当做推进的范围被呈现,做得成的
藉由 100 的统一输入风的 MJ－产生,AC 电力对每个类型的能源
储藏技术.锂－离子的电池电的车辆能最多达成 133 公里
以这输入排列.在差别中,被压缩的空气汽车和燃料电池车辆达成 46
而且 42 公里,分别地,藉由一样的输入电力的 100 MJ.车辆
范围在一个标准的都市驾驶周期中为金牛座－班级的车辆驾驶被比较.
介绍
再生能源技术很快敏锐能源世代市场,
主要地回应紧急的减少温室气体 （GHGs）的需要发表
进入气氛之内.中央的能源产生器像百万瓦－刻度的用来发电的风车,奔跑－ofthe－
河水力电气的植物,潮汐的和波车站适当整合进入这之内
电的格子.但是这些新资源如何能最好地被用来移置 GHGs
被汽油的全世界舰队和加燃料柴油的车辆生产?
甚至太阳的光电伏打能源,适当的为分配的申请,不能够有力量一
中立派,消费者－直接地的友好车辆.能源密度必需的为这
被消费者期望的汽车表现只是太高而无法穿越是可得
商业做得成的光电伏打产品.被限制到轨道的车辆能利用
能源从比较大的太阳力量安装或其他可重新开始的技术传输,
但是独立的车辆总是需要能源储藏.
因为压力扩大缩减车辆的 GHG 排放物,大部份的资源
为目的考虑将会现在是相同的电产生技术
被增加输电网.因此疑问和将会指导新车辆的答案
发展煮沸几乎完全地下方对比较级能源储藏分析
技术.
在这纸中,我们藉由放置各种不同的能源示范如此的一项比较分析
从系统边界开始的的背景的储藏技术这
在一种统一的工作产品的任何电产生器,和结束的终端机：移动福特
金牛座－班级的汽车完成的都市驾驶循环.
在自己完善一下