搜搜考试网尼罗河上的惨案英文读后感
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：搜搜考试网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/04/29 13:35:11
尼罗河上的惨案英文读后感
急求一篇《尼罗河上的惨案》的英文读后感,包括内容介绍及从中引发的感想,
急求一篇《尼罗河上的惨案》的英文读后感,包括内容介绍及从中引发的感想,
I just took over the "Death on the Nile" ( "The tragedy on the Nile"),the cloud of Wuli.Then must not the words to bear down on all sides,we must uphold the principle of dialysis,and strive to understand the effect.In a novel,the effect is synonymous with the plot,so read plot enough.
The first is the effect of guessing words and then guess the gist of the original.Words can not really tell,but also guess from the spelling part of speech.Very often,just enough to know that part of speech.For example:"Hercule Poirot shook his head and shuddered slightly." Investigation did not have time to "shudder",but it is easy to see that it is an action,detective Poirot to know a little "shudder" then,it is enough.And large landscape descriptions or more characters do not have to look at the description of appearance,as they push forward with the cases not directly linked.
Despite the considerable number of new words no investigation,I have read dozens of pages after a general idea of the "Miss Lin Neite Simon and her husband went to the Nile on the tour,Miss suddenly killed,witnesses have died mysteriously," the basic plot.
A turn for the better detective stories,many doubts,often describing the details of the key may be the case.For example,clues left by the murderer,that is,through the writer seems to describe the details of inadvertently exposed.Through a large number of new words,I had to ignore a lot of details - I am sure that you want to read the loss.
The contrary,in strict compliance with the dialysis technology,I read the crime took place in the moment,probably already guessed who the murderer,and they suspect that the murderer may have accomplices - for aiding and abetting each other to create a large number is not present evidence; only guess not specific means for its commission.The outcome of confirmed my guess is quite correct.
I guess not rely on the details,but intuition.The so-called intuition is not something vague,but from my grasp of the effect.Details of the crime shows the specific steps,and told me the effect was fully human characters.Humanity is the writer to shape the most deliberate thing.Detective story is no exception.Simon in his capacity as the background,speech and deportment to the constantly caught my attention,even though a lot of details missing,but I doubt he has not give up too - the crime turns out to be distortions caused by the tragedy of human nature.Later I also read "The return of Sherlock Holmes" ( "Sherlock Holmes return"),"The Moonstone" ( "moon gems"),such as detective novels,the effect is still in the grasp,ignored the principle of the details of the study completed.The moralist who may be reading this did not,but I was not confused reading,the full enjoyment of the fun of the case.
The first is the effect of guessing words and then guess the gist of the original.Words can not really tell,but also guess from the spelling part of speech.Very often,just enough to know that part of speech.For example:"Hercule Poirot shook his head and shuddered slightly." Investigation did not have time to "shudder",but it is easy to see that it is an action,detective Poirot to know a little "shudder" then,it is enough.And large landscape descriptions or more characters do not have to look at the description of appearance,as they push forward with the cases not directly linked.
Despite the considerable number of new words no investigation,I have read dozens of pages after a general idea of the "Miss Lin Neite Simon and her husband went to the Nile on the tour,Miss suddenly killed,witnesses have died mysteriously," the basic plot.
A turn for the better detective stories,many doubts,often describing the details of the key may be the case.For example,clues left by the murderer,that is,through the writer seems to describe the details of inadvertently exposed.Through a large number of new words,I had to ignore a lot of details - I am sure that you want to read the loss.
The contrary,in strict compliance with the dialysis technology,I read the crime took place in the moment,probably already guessed who the murderer,and they suspect that the murderer may have accomplices - for aiding and abetting each other to create a large number is not present evidence; only guess not specific means for its commission.The outcome of confirmed my guess is quite correct.
I guess not rely on the details,but intuition.The so-called intuition is not something vague,but from my grasp of the effect.Details of the crime shows the specific steps,and told me the effect was fully human characters.Humanity is the writer to shape the most deliberate thing.Detective story is no exception.Simon in his capacity as the background,speech and deportment to the constantly caught my attention,even though a lot of details missing,but I doubt he has not give up too - the crime turns out to be distortions caused by the tragedy of human nature.Later I also read "The return of Sherlock Holmes" ( "Sherlock Holmes return"),"The Moonstone" ( "moon gems"),such as detective novels,the effect is still in the grasp,ignored the principle of the details of the study completed.The moralist who may be reading this did not,but I was not confused reading,the full enjoyment of the fun of the case.