搜搜考试网新GRE作文 Argument 求批改 求狠批
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：搜搜考试网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/06/05 09:15:16
新GRE作文 Argument 求批改 求狠批
Argument的29题.1.Green和Blue两者无可比性.2.Bicycle lane不一定解决问题.3.骑自行车上下班不现实.
The argument have many assumptions which are not reasonable.On the one hand,the situation of traffic jams on Green Highway last year might not be comparable to that of Blue Highway.On the other hand,adding a bicycle lane along the highway might not solve to question.Further,it is actually not feasible for citizens to commute with a bicycle regarding the long distance.
As it is mentioned in the argument,last year,Green highway's adding another lane caused a worsening traffic jam.The passage thus supposes that by simulating the action of Green Highway,the Blue Highway will also suffered from severe traffic jams.The recommendation,however,is not cogent.Firstly,the natural situation and location of Green Highway and Blue Highway is disparate.Perhaps the natural construction of the soil of the Green Highway is inferior,and the new constructed lane caused a even more severe land distruction.In other cases,it was last year when the Green Highway constructed the lane.At that time,some events happened and much more cars went into the road.
The argument mentions that a bicycle should be built and it can ease the traffic pressure.Further investigations should still be conducted before taking the action.We don't know that natural condition of Blue Highway and building a bicycle lane might be imprudent.Perhaps the road conditions are poor and cyclers are prone to cause more traffic accidents.They may jam the traffic by not obeying the traffic rules.Building a bicycle lane would be a waste of time and financial funds in this case.So it is plausible that the assumption in the passage is unreasonable.
Finally,we have to consider whether it is practical for people to use bicycles to commute on the highway.Nowadays,many people live in the suburbs and work in the downtown.There is a long distance between the two places.Even the citizens are keen on bicycles,they may not use them for transportation for the sake of long distance.And in this case,few people would like to use bicycle on the lane.They do not want to be late for work or go home late.In my opinion,further polls about the willingness of citizens to use bicycles to commute should still be conducted.
Green Highway and Blue Highway are disparate roads and locate in disparate areas.They are not comparable.Whether there would be a lot of people using bicycle or not still remains to be a myth.Further,even people use bicycle,it is hard to say that the jam on traffic would be solved.In my opinion,the government is necessary to consider more about this question.
Argument的29题.1.Green和Blue两者无可比性.2.Bicycle lane不一定解决问题.3.骑自行车上下班不现实.
The argument have many assumptions which are not reasonable.On the one hand,the situation of traffic jams on Green Highway last year might not be comparable to that of Blue Highway.On the other hand,adding a bicycle lane along the highway might not solve to question.Further,it is actually not feasible for citizens to commute with a bicycle regarding the long distance.
As it is mentioned in the argument,last year,Green highway's adding another lane caused a worsening traffic jam.The passage thus supposes that by simulating the action of Green Highway,the Blue Highway will also suffered from severe traffic jams.The recommendation,however,is not cogent.Firstly,the natural situation and location of Green Highway and Blue Highway is disparate.Perhaps the natural construction of the soil of the Green Highway is inferior,and the new constructed lane caused a even more severe land distruction.In other cases,it was last year when the Green Highway constructed the lane.At that time,some events happened and much more cars went into the road.
The argument mentions that a bicycle should be built and it can ease the traffic pressure.Further investigations should still be conducted before taking the action.We don't know that natural condition of Blue Highway and building a bicycle lane might be imprudent.Perhaps the road conditions are poor and cyclers are prone to cause more traffic accidents.They may jam the traffic by not obeying the traffic rules.Building a bicycle lane would be a waste of time and financial funds in this case.So it is plausible that the assumption in the passage is unreasonable.
Finally,we have to consider whether it is practical for people to use bicycles to commute on the highway.Nowadays,many people live in the suburbs and work in the downtown.There is a long distance between the two places.Even the citizens are keen on bicycles,they may not use them for transportation for the sake of long distance.And in this case,few people would like to use bicycle on the lane.They do not want to be late for work or go home late.In my opinion,further polls about the willingness of citizens to use bicycles to commute should still be conducted.
Green Highway and Blue Highway are disparate roads and locate in disparate areas.They are not comparable.Whether there would be a lot of people using bicycle or not still remains to be a myth.Further,even people use bicycle,it is hard to say that the jam on traffic would be solved.In my opinion,the government is necessary to consider more about this question.
The argument have many assumptions which are not reasonable.-> any argument has assumptions which are not reasonable.
As it is mentioned in the argument,last year,Green highway's adding another lane caused a worsening traffic jam.-> As mentioned in the argument,the addition of a new lane caused Green highway a worsening traffic jam in last year
请参考.
再问： 谢谢！！！！！
As it is mentioned in the argument,last year,Green highway's adding another lane caused a worsening traffic jam.-> As mentioned in the argument,the addition of a new lane caused Green highway a worsening traffic jam in last year
请参考.
再问： 谢谢！！！！！