作业帮 > 综合 > 作业

汉译英,拒绝机翻上诉庭最终结论:上诉庭建议,既然专家小组和上诉庭都确认巴西的补贴措施不符合《反补贴协议》的规定,DSB应

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:搜搜考试网作业帮 分类:综合作业 时间:2024/06/07 14:23:53
汉译英,拒绝机翻
上诉庭最终结论:
上诉庭建议,既然专家小组和上诉庭都确认巴西的补贴措施不符合《反补贴协议》的规定,DSB应要求巴西在90日内取消它根据PROEX计划向国产飞机提供的出口补贴.
1999年8月双方就执行专家小组和上诉庭报告达成了协议.1999年11月19日,巴西通知说它已经在90日内履行了专家小组建议.11月23日,加拿大要求成立专家小组,确认巴西并未执行专家小组建议.1999年12月9日,DSB决定由原专家小组对这一问题做出结论.澳大利亚、欧盟和美国保留第三方权利.2000年5月2日,专家小组确认,巴西宣称符合专家小组报告的措施或者根本不存在,或者仍不符合专家小组报告的要求.
汉译英,拒绝机翻上诉庭最终结论:上诉庭建议,既然专家小组和上诉庭都确认巴西的补贴措施不符合《反补贴协议》的规定,DSB应
Conclusion:the final appeal court
However,since the expert group and the appeal court confirm Brazil subsidies countervailing measures does not conform to the provisions of the agreement shall be required in Brazil,DSB within 90 days cancel it according to the domestic plane provides PROEX plan of export subsidies.
In August 1999,the execution team of experts and appeals court report reached an agreement.On November 19,1999,Brazil notice says it has performed in 90 days expert group suggested.On November 23,Canada requires that Brazil founded team of experts,and did not execute team of experts suggest.On Dec.9,1999 by the DSB expert panel decision on this issue.Australia,the European Union and the third party rights reserved.On May 2nd 2000,expert group,Brazil declared conform to the expert group report measures or doesn't exist,or still do not conform to the requirements of the expert group report.